Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 07:52:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0960071269692BB513002E3E8E67AD6FBFEB13ADFCE140EEDC5D5A8121AF2875
Participant Details

Original Note:

Part 7 > Inspections > Other Powers > #4 A-E This language would suggest that "any" evidence could be used during an investigation of a citizen. It does not explicitly state the evidence had to exist prior to the bill, which means it could be retroactive evidence https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-63/first-reading

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787941471099740540
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0960071269692BB513002E3E8E67AD6FBFEB13ADFCE140EEDC5D5A8121AF2875
  • createdAtMillis - 1715154771339
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17879414710997405400960071269692BB513002E3E8E67AD6FBFEB13ADFCE140EEDC5D5A8121AF2875