Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 09:51:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F88701EED315D853EF3EAF67B5AA324CFE29F9B592A23764130E06D7E1D36121
Participant Details

Original Note:

Como bien explica la noticia del propio enlace, no son 57 veces al mes, si no 57 veces en un mes. La resolución considera que al tener ambos un hijo en común y estar la mujer obstaculizando el acceso al menor, esas 57 llamadas podrían ser del padre intentando saber de él. https://www.eldiario.es/murcia/sociedad/audiencia-provincial-murcia-considera-llamar-57-veces-mes-ex-colarse-casa-no-acoso_1_11344641.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1787895554766172614
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F88701EED315D853EF3EAF67B5AA324CFE29F9B592A23764130E06D7E1D36121
createdAtMillis - 1715161915864
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1787895554766172614F88701EED315D853EF3EAF67B5AA324CFE29F9B592A23764130E06D7E1D36121