Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 08:34:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E4E8566DBA288F9FB7310B6E22B85CCB50424A209BCA37E5D210B26AEB02724
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN - The note saying NNN clearly didn't read the last part of the tweet where they're stating that this is an inappropriate or bizarre activity to partake in. Users may be mislead as such, would fall under misrepresentation, and context is required.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787882576733966429
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E4E8566DBA288F9FB7310B6E22B85CCB50424A209BCA37E5D210B26AEB02724
  • createdAtMillis - 1715157265866
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17878825767339664294E4E8566DBA288F9FB7310B6E22B85CCB50424A209BCA37E5D210B26AEB02724