Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-07 19:11:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9CBA9BC0D4D397311A13B299C0E9136625AD622A6456F8DC76F9C4DB20560F1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Das ist falsch. Es werden hier bewusst Falschinformationen verbreitet. In Wahrheit wurde lediglich das Büro des EX-Mitarbeiters untersucht, was vollkommen logisch ist. https://x.com/krahmax/status/1787769064267341955?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787829745587015689
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9CBA9BC0D4D397311A13B299C0E9136625AD622A6456F8DC76F9C4DB20560F1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1715109069004
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17878297455870156899CBA9BC0D4D397311A13B299C0E9136625AD622A6456F8DC76F9C4DB20560F1C