Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-07 12:11:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DC3A658C3549485688E3B2661F7C509837409D6255E1B600E6E5397E387A8C4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This would be inadmissible in court. The defence could argue the wrong person has been brought before the court due as a modified image had been used to ID them. Authenticity of an image, including that it has not been manipulated, must be proven. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/identification#:~:text=Code%20D%20sets%20out%20the,E%2C%20paras%206%20and%208.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787784612099309846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DC3A658C3549485688E3B2661F7C509837409D6255E1B600E6E5397E387A8C4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1715083914836
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1787784612099309846DC3A658C3549485688E3B2661F7C509837409D6255E1B600E6E5397E387A8C4B