Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-07 14:16:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57F9560105C99C6F80F4F7A7A213003B6BE73720301EB446B4437309FEE49BFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This would be inadmissible in court. The defence could argue the wrong person has been brought before the court due as a modified image had been used to ID them. Authenticity of an image, including that it has not been manipulated, must be proven. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/identification#:~:text=Code%20D%20sets%20out%20the,E%2C%20paras%206%20and%208.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787784612099309846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57F9560105C99C6F80F4F7A7A213003B6BE73720301EB446B4437309FEE49BFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1715091411715
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178778461209930984657F9560105C99C6F80F4F7A7A213003B6BE73720301EB446B4437309FEE49BFA