Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 23:38:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0BAE17B212E4D1F5462C6E7E2B764066B14C56CA4AF6115BCAA1A3087B05B5A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

This would be inadmissible in court. The defence could argue the wrong person has been brought before the court due as a modified image had been used to ID them. Authenticity of an image, including that it has not been manipulated, must be proven. https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/identification#:~:text=Code%20D%20sets%20out%20the,E%2C%20paras%206%20and%208.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787784612099309846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0BAE17B212E4D1F5462C6E7E2B764066B14C56CA4AF6115BCAA1A3087B05B5A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1715211480542
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17877846120993098460BAE17B212E4D1F5462C6E7E2B764066B14C56CA4AF6115BCAA1A3087B05B5A4