Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-07 08:22:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 19FA3CAD4E3DE6C928399B5B0FD0374F97C60950460E9E4318D73E798684D30C
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no scientific basis for earthquake prediction. Quakes are always possible in areas with active faults, but specific forecasts perform no better than random when tested: https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00685-y https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-earthquake-prediction-262451352553 https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz4jyz/earthquake-conspiracy-theorists-are-wreaking-havoc-during-emergencies https://www.inverse.com/science/earthquake-prediction-dutchsinse-holmquist-conspiracy Countless large-scale studies show no link between vaccines and autism: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M18-2101 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/ss/ss6503a1.htm https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4334107/ http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2010/09/13/peds.2010-0309 http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/123/2/475.long http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/114/3/584.long https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccines-and-other-conditions/vaccines-autism
All Note Details