Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-07 06:13:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A881B4BB35836B6ADE86BFE135812EB1E82289CCE7FD8B393FBF6F21E6F96C8E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Potentially breaking story. Wikipedia is not a good source to use in this context as a rebuttal.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787616657185116163
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A881B4BB35836B6ADE86BFE135812EB1E82289CCE7FD8B393FBF6F21E6F96C8E
  • createdAtMillis - 1715062422453
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1787616657185116163A881B4BB35836B6ADE86BFE135812EB1E82289CCE7FD8B393FBF6F21E6F96C8E