Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-07 04:22:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5797ADE87D1AC9490BB611004B754D717439C3BD4E055F6E9CFBE5E72FB653F0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The tweet does not claim that the image is AI. It shows that the app/site 'AI Or Not' deems it to be likely. This is not the same as the tweet author posting that the image *is* factually an AI generation. Therefore, the proposed community note is irrelevant and not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787582808883429423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5797ADE87D1AC9490BB611004B754D717439C3BD4E055F6E9CFBE5E72FB653F0
  • createdAtMillis - 1715055752921
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17875828088834294235797ADE87D1AC9490BB611004B754D717439C3BD4E055F6E9CFBE5E72FB653F0