Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 20:32:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A2FA9FFC757A0E0E01F198062B278DCBF9F2214222F8074B99D4D258A713E058
Participant Details

Original Note:

NASA may have based their considerations on existing infrastructure, but that doesn’t prevent SpaceX from clean-slate redesigning Dragon2. Unless evidence that refutes the tweet is presented, the suggested CN is speculation on how development progressed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787577944409260522
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A2FA9FFC757A0E0E01F198062B278DCBF9F2214222F8074B99D4D258A713E058
  • createdAtMillis - 1715027536472
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1787577944409260522A2FA9FFC757A0E0E01F198062B278DCBF9F2214222F8074B99D4D258A713E058