Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 18:15:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 62B558D5D1E97DBE816EF96E978F31193A35FC54EFD0DB64275D722D7CB62517
Participant Details

Original Note:

É complicado colocar nota quando não se pode afirmar que o post é enganoso. Informação em off é também informação e a fonte é uma coluna do Correio Braziliense. Não creio caber nota aqui, não no momento.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787540181991428509
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 62B558D5D1E97DBE816EF96E978F31193A35FC54EFD0DB64275D722D7CB62517
  • createdAtMillis - 1715019341004
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178754018199142850962B558D5D1E97DBE816EF96E978F31193A35FC54EFD0DB64275D722D7CB62517