Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 15:53:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9851411960F6CDB0BCF2F09FB7802EF37BEDA3138C2EDDABDCC7F96C72E1BC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Being intentionally disingenuous does not change the fact that the numbers listed are both accurate and extremely anomalous. Statistical anomalies of such magnitude absolutely warrant investigation, especially in relation to national elections. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3728626

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1787460361890750709
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E9851411960F6CDB0BCF2F09FB7802EF37BEDA3138C2EDDABDCC7F96C72E1BC9
createdAtMillis - 1715010808559
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1787460361890750709E9851411960F6CDB0BCF2F09FB7802EF37BEDA3138C2EDDABDCC7F96C72E1BC9