Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 13:06:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0F0E305F386C30EF09BBB9B6429DC5484F342029A16E1700B210DE94A276F2E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Being intentionally disingenuous does not change the fact that the numbers listed are both accurate and extremely anomalous. Statistical anomalies of such magnitude absolutely warrant investigation, especially in relation to national elections. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3728626

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787460361890750709
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0F0E305F386C30EF09BBB9B6429DC5484F342029A16E1700B210DE94A276F2E
  • createdAtMillis - 1715000769680
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1787460361890750709E0F0E305F386C30EF09BBB9B6429DC5484F342029A16E1700B210DE94A276F2E