Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 14:19:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DC0EB3CB71794F25424FA938D9951D36A2F2805DCF30BC74E5D889376EDF8EF7
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Being intentionally disingenuous does not change the fact that the numbers listed are both accurate and extremely anomalous. Statistical anomalies of such magnitude absolutely warrant investigation, especially in relation to national elections. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3728626

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787460361890750709
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DC0EB3CB71794F25424FA938D9951D36A2F2805DCF30BC74E5D889376EDF8EF7
  • createdAtMillis - 1715005170669
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1787460361890750709DC0EB3CB71794F25424FA938D9951D36A2F2805DCF30BC74E5D889376EDF8EF7