Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 20:50:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64866CB3D0DCF199EA78ED212B8DFA7C85BB4A964851F201BB6335686C007592
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Being intentionally disingenuous does not change the fact that the numbers listed are both accurate and extremely anomalous. Statistical anomalies of such magnitude absolutely warrant investigation, especially in relation to national elections. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3728626

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787460361890750709
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64866CB3D0DCF199EA78ED212B8DFA7C85BB4A964851F201BB6335686C007592
  • createdAtMillis - 1715028628885
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178746036189075070964866CB3D0DCF199EA78ED212B8DFA7C85BB4A964851F201BB6335686C007592