Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 18:28:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E74D6F25D89095E3336490E650FECE50CF51128E0933A4400793D8C8F696FA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Being intentionally disingenuous does not change the fact that the numbers listed are both accurate and extremely anomalous. Statistical anomalies of such magnitude absolutely warrant investigation, especially in relation to national elections. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3728626

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787460361890750709
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E74D6F25D89095E3336490E650FECE50CF51128E0933A4400793D8C8F696FA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1715020103454
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17874603618907507090E74D6F25D89095E3336490E650FECE50CF51128E0933A4400793D8C8F696FA3