Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 10:02:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B57B18BB63E97EB7AF27016BCB9C90929FB2F86BDFBC794A094E4F308371ECD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The depicted court decision is an injunction (einstweilige Verfügung), not a final judgment. In this case, the injunction was issued without an actual hearing for reasons of "urgency". German law also does not recognise the doctrine of precedent/stare decisis. https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorl%C3%A4ufiger_Rechtsschutz https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pr%C3%A4zedenzfall

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787418831809343567
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B57B18BB63E97EB7AF27016BCB9C90929FB2F86BDFBC794A094E4F308371ECD
  • createdAtMillis - 1714989775715
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17874188318093435671B57B18BB63E97EB7AF27016BCB9C90929FB2F86BDFBC794A094E4F308371ECD