Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 21:00:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44029DD1F3D616C162276B0797587D1989F9278BECA2CCF1B747428DB27410AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

リンク先で言及されている朝日新聞の記事は、同紙の意見ではなく、同紙が実施した世論調査の結果を取り上げたものです。朝日新聞自身が言論統制を訴えているとするリンク先タイトルとまとめ内容は誤りを含みます。ご注意ください。 https://www.asahi.com/articles/DA3S15926313.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787391409894678897
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 44029DD1F3D616C162276B0797587D1989F9278BECA2CCF1B747428DB27410AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1715029234220
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 178739140989467889744029DD1F3D616C162276B0797587D1989F9278BECA2CCF1B747428DB27410AB