Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 20:42:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5186580F3832F5EB9009AF49E128D528F9DD5CA1FF9588F2283D830A011E9755
Participant Details

Original Note:

La nota procede de una página de dudosa creación, no cumple como nota informativa. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/espanol/2P6NEAKHXZLJDERXKUC6FOS6GE-2024-04-04/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787361708484251798
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5186580F3832F5EB9009AF49E128D528F9DD5CA1FF9588F2283D830A011E9755
  • createdAtMillis - 1715028161973
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17873617084842517985186580F3832F5EB9009AF49E128D528F9DD5CA1FF9588F2283D830A011E9755