Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-05 23:54:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DDDFF3833E058FB4790FEFC3422A60A86CCE85179DD0EC71CAC2D5039D4CA951
Participant Details

Original Note:

実際はその年の各年齢層の死亡率から計算する平均寿命で見て 蔓延時の寿命短縮は低接種のまま蔓延させた国地域の方が甚大だった事に注意が必要です↓ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01450-3 例えば日本の平均寿命の短縮は21年+22年で19年比で0.27年程ですが↓ https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/life/life22/dl/life22-09.pdf 同じく高齢低接種のブルガリアは19年比で21年は3.8年短縮,22年は0.9年短縮で合計4.7年の短縮でした↓ https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:Table01_Life_expectancy_at_birth_1980-2022_v1.png また3回接種者がコロナ死や全死因死亡リスクが低かった事は勿論↓ https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(23)00246-8/fulltext 党別にみても元々超過死亡率に大差のなかった2党員は接種開始後大幅に低接種党員の方が超過死亡率が高くなりこの差は低接種州ほど大きかった事が報告済です https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2807617

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787248818612027452
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DDDFF3833E058FB4790FEFC3422A60A86CCE85179DD0EC71CAC2D5039D4CA951
  • createdAtMillis - 1714953256641
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1787248818612027452DDDFF3833E058FB4790FEFC3422A60A86CCE85179DD0EC71CAC2D5039D4CA951