Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-05 21:32:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 481A3790FC93CB3D0EA8A9182078EC18E676C751E14AA4B78F7556812AB29036
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twierdzenie, że M.Kierwiński był pijany nie ma poparcia realnymi dowodami, więc może być uznane za naruszenie jego dóbr. To, że "wydawał się pijany" jest jedynie opinią i spekulacją.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787116831632683395
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 481A3790FC93CB3D0EA8A9182078EC18E676C751E14AA4B78F7556812AB29036
  • createdAtMillis - 1714944725756
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1787116831632683395481A3790FC93CB3D0EA8A9182078EC18E676C751E14AA4B78F7556812AB29036