Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-05 17:44:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3271419A65639FEF4243DB4142D50D8BAF394AD16CD19DAF796C1322CA8C69AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Yes, the Cass Review's final report & recommendations are based on peer-reviewed systematic evidence reviews. The reviews were conducted by academics at the University of York's Centre for Reviews & Dissemination. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/final-report-faqs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787114901749846241
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3271419A65639FEF4243DB4142D50D8BAF394AD16CD19DAF796C1322CA8C69AA
  • createdAtMillis - 1714931080158
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17871149017498462413271419A65639FEF4243DB4142D50D8BAF394AD16CD19DAF796C1322CA8C69AA