Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-09 04:43:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 88A29D8A2AAE22B2329290B7A50B02A53591FE00C686B40D9A12B1D5A3CA6C6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - 確かにセンサー電球の消費電力は微々たるものですが、元ポストは個人的な直感に基づく意見を述べているのみであり、省エネ観点でのセンサー電球の買い控えを喧伝することを目的としたポストではないと考えられるため、ノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787104557828538763
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 88A29D8A2AAE22B2329290B7A50B02A53591FE00C686B40D9A12B1D5A3CA6C6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1715229814842
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 178710455782853876388A29D8A2AAE22B2329290B7A50B02A53591FE00C686B40D9A12B1D5A3CA6C6D