Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-09 01:28:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5EA7B37E5C2ABA8D8FC58C23F2EB97FE2AEB38568FBE0666EFE6231495F686C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - 確かにセンサー電球の消費電力は微々たるものですが、元ポストは個人的な直感に基づく意見を述べているのみであり、省エネ観点でのセンサー電球の買い控えを喧伝することを目的としたポストではないと考えられるため、ノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787104557828538763
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5EA7B37E5C2ABA8D8FC58C23F2EB97FE2AEB38568FBE0666EFE6231495F686C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1715218116853
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17871045578285387635EA7B37E5C2ABA8D8FC58C23F2EB97FE2AEB38568FBE0666EFE6231495F686C2