Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-05 14:53:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F17E0809F1341713EC828EADA540A6128FF1122CD59AA35248A7C9230DBCF17
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - 確かにセンサー電球の消費電力は微々たるものですが、元ポストは個人的な直感に基づく意見を述べているのみであり、省エネ観点でのセンサー電球の買い控えを喧伝することを目的としたポストではないと考えられるため、ノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787104557828538763
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F17E0809F1341713EC828EADA540A6128FF1122CD59AA35248A7C9230DBCF17
  • createdAtMillis - 1714920809683
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17871045578285387634F17E0809F1341713EC828EADA540A6128FF1122CD59AA35248A7C9230DBCF17