Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-05 14:44:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CACE26CC9CFFE9F8333750E0A2732DD5FAF3473A196F8E174DFDD496FCF45AA6
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/gaza-fatality-data-has-become-completely-unreliable This article points out that some deaths may have been under reported in order to minimise combatant deaths and therefore over report the proportion of civilian casualties. It also says that the total number of deaths, to which Corbyn refers, is probably an under estimate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787084900857774394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CACE26CC9CFFE9F8333750E0A2732DD5FAF3473A196F8E174DFDD496FCF45AA6
  • createdAtMillis - 1714920240977
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1787084900857774394CACE26CC9CFFE9F8333750E0A2732DD5FAF3473A196F8E174DFDD496FCF45AA6