Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-05 17:30:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C965F4D1167E40397368EFF09D26383A7DCEB5CF65D95C71695EF991CECD33F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/gaza-fatality-data-has-become-completely-unreliable This article points out that some deaths may have been under reported in order to minimise combatant deaths and therefore over report the proportion of civilian casualties. It also says that the total number of deaths, to which Corbyn refers, is probably an under estimate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787084900857774394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C965F4D1167E40397368EFF09D26383A7DCEB5CF65D95C71695EF991CECD33F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1714930251249
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1787084900857774394C965F4D1167E40397368EFF09D26383A7DCEB5CF65D95C71695EF991CECD33F1