Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-08 16:32:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9AE4DA3F443377E60DD6578337FB49E285F93BDDC6C958DF8AD213BC303EC675
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/gaza-fatality-data-has-become-completely-unreliable This article points out that some deaths may have been under reported in order to minimise combatant deaths and therefore over report the proportion of civilian casualties. It also says that the total number of deaths, to which Corbyn refers, is probably an under estimate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787084900857774394
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9AE4DA3F443377E60DD6578337FB49E285F93BDDC6C958DF8AD213BC303EC675
  • createdAtMillis - 1715185934669
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17870849008577743949AE4DA3F443377E60DD6578337FB49E285F93BDDC6C958DF8AD213BC303EC675