Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-05 12:17:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA93FFF3755EE564FB27ACD82B5441E8104175E5F866EF182CED6BF16BB92E78
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass Review rated Turban's own research (Turban 2020: http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1725) as "low quality". In particular: "No information given on number of participants excluded from analyses due to missing data" and "age and sex were not adjusted for". (Taylor et al. 2024, supplementary table S4) https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326669 https://adc.bmj.com/content/archdischild/early/2024/04/09/archdischild-2023-326669/DC5/embed/inline-supplementary-material-5.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787074974026461306
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA93FFF3755EE564FB27ACD82B5441E8104175E5F866EF182CED6BF16BB92E78
  • createdAtMillis - 1714911438962
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1787074974026461306DA93FFF3755EE564FB27ACD82B5441E8104175E5F866EF182CED6BF16BB92E78