Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-29 09:32:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E630EDA35F431BE951E0036E78E26E1DF9EB0A1C42BA7C71E21FB4BC93C6BA2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The figure giving in the post is incorrect due to a misunderstanding of the document. It uses the figure if 50 for number of pregnancies, which is not the full count, and 22 as the number of miscarriages, which ignores the fact that several of the women are reported on twice. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N3010NY/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787048595088167333
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E630EDA35F431BE951E0036E78E26E1DF9EB0A1C42BA7C71E21FB4BC93C6BA2
  • createdAtMillis - 1716975169008
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17870485950881673334E630EDA35F431BE951E0036E78E26E1DF9EB0A1C42BA7C71E21FB4BC93C6BA2