Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 03:09:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5365BBA5305C1179B231259EFA2666DD5D3DADCA245037077B9470C1C81AEB69
Participant Details

Original Note:

The letter's authenticity is contested, and apparently with strong arguments. https://twitter.com/PhDniX/status/1787014815740834128?t=g8GGsV8d-w5iBheGyYFPbQ&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1787043562112131488
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5365BBA5305C1179B231259EFA2666DD5D3DADCA245037077B9470C1C81AEB69
  • createdAtMillis - 1714964942482
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17870435621121314885365BBA5305C1179B231259EFA2666DD5D3DADCA245037077B9470C1C81AEB69