Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-05 06:20:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3C1372B280D81BA4CDB38E1DD861727F6CFA3BA40513681CBC04AE157222B2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Peer Review is a specific process of review by several unbiased experts, not just a single person. The Cass Report has not been peer reviewed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786882790270939316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3C1372B280D81BA4CDB38E1DD861727F6CFA3BA40513681CBC04AE157222B2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1714890014505
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786882790270939316F3C1372B280D81BA4CDB38E1DD861727F6CFA3BA40513681CBC04AE157222B2D