Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-06 08:56:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3A3C33DE2C5B04904C1F64C8DE9DE05ABD542568CCA8D42BE604EBEF6F3ED83
Participant Details

Original Note:

Peer Review is a specific process of review by several unbiased experts, not just a single person. The Cass Report has not been peer reviewed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786882790270939316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E3A3C33DE2C5B04904C1F64C8DE9DE05ABD542568CCA8D42BE604EBEF6F3ED83
  • createdAtMillis - 1714985776950
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786882790270939316E3A3C33DE2C5B04904C1F64C8DE9DE05ABD542568CCA8D42BE604EBEF6F3ED83