Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-05 05:46:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DB991448F105151163FCD0F3D6EF3D80368D5E96457F703415D67EEBBD657C19
Participant Details

Original Note:

Peer Review is a specific process of review by several unbiased experts, not just a single person. The Cass Report has not been peer reviewed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786882790270939316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DB991448F105151163FCD0F3D6EF3D80368D5E96457F703415D67EEBBD657C19
  • createdAtMillis - 1714887981243
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786882790270939316DB991448F105151163FCD0F3D6EF3D80368D5E96457F703415D67EEBBD657C19