Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-04 21:19:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F9CB4B61130AC3388FE09B0B7E21A3EF41590E82FA1111A37E1AAEDE18996493
Participant Details
Original Note:
multiple experts, medical professionals & scholars have shown that the Cass Report has overt prejudice, pathologisation, poor & inconsistent use of evidence, non-evidenced claims, & the intentional exclusion of service users and trans healthcare experts from the Review process. https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details