Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-04 22:13:45 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F6ED43C7524ACC3AA5E25F379967F10FA152BE36A0FD2E3728086F23AE9ECCC4
Participant Details
Original Note:
multiple experts, medical professionals & scholars have shown that the Cass Report has overt prejudice, pathologisation, poor & inconsistent use of evidence, non-evidenced claims, & the intentional exclusion of service users and trans healthcare experts from the Review process. https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details