Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-04 19:57:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D0FB9191F71BE7DB8A831F54C00B50495E91ADA84463FBBDD723F5098199019F
Participant Details
Original Note:
multiple experts, medical professionals & scholars have shown that the Cass Report has overt prejudice, pathologisation, poor & inconsistent use of evidence, non-evidenced claims, & the intentional exclusion of service users and trans healthcare experts from the Review process. https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details