Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-05 05:32:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: CC352B163DBA6F71EC3873E917B84AD49F782B3DECC3FEFE8A17C3A16E7A4209
Participant Details
Original Note:
multiple experts, medical professionals & scholars have shown that the Cass Report has overt prejudice, pathologisation, poor & inconsistent use of evidence, non-evidenced claims, & the intentional exclusion of service users and trans healthcare experts from the Review process. https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details