Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-04 22:56:47 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 89FF6F7BA235C930DB5A57CE550C83B1EA7231C3DB0B6F8D230ADD07D1530458
Participant Details
Original Note:
multiple experts, medical professionals & scholars have shown that the Cass Report has overt prejudice, pathologisation, poor & inconsistent use of evidence, non-evidenced claims, & the intentional exclusion of service users and trans healthcare experts from the Review process. https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details