Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-05 20:31:48 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 8453A010B9C3DE5B28380E4B8BB138D43E9C26936255D8D09DECDB19E16EB7EA
Participant Details
Original Note:
multiple experts, medical professionals & scholars have shown that the Cass Report has overt prejudice, pathologisation, poor & inconsistent use of evidence, non-evidenced claims, & the intentional exclusion of service users and trans healthcare experts from the Review process. https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details