Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-04 21:17:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3F7A80EB24B813BC665295B44E1DF8E31B6B6D7CC1B26BD8E39EA36BB59F74EE
Participant Details
Original Note:
multiple experts, medical professionals & scholars have shown that the Cass Report has overt prejudice, pathologisation, poor & inconsistent use of evidence, non-evidenced claims, & the intentional exclusion of service users and trans healthcare experts from the Review process. https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details