Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-06 17:25:24 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 34159493A766C9E446CFD0F4DB1B02B84220B2B9623A05DCE1A1BE7DF1E1A3E5
Participant Details
Original Note:
multiple experts, medical professionals & scholars have shown that the Cass Report has overt prejudice, pathologisation, poor & inconsistent use of evidence, non-evidenced claims, & the intentional exclusion of service users and trans healthcare experts from the Review process. https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details