Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-04 20:08:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 256DA7DA44F08C2F2C155B699D04A7ADA06A3EF30E09203A0B849CDD75479E87
Participant Details
Original Note:
multiple experts, medical professionals & scholars have shown that the Cass Report has overt prejudice, pathologisation, poor & inconsistent use of evidence, non-evidenced claims, & the intentional exclusion of service users and trans healthcare experts from the Review process. https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details