Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-04 20:21:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 1B98B3FD111A83B3315BEEBE4B2260028BFFCB92D97AD7A859E17141BEE91011
Participant Details
Original Note:
multiple experts, medical professionals & scholars have shown that the Cass Report has overt prejudice, pathologisation, poor & inconsistent use of evidence, non-evidenced claims, & the intentional exclusion of service users and trans healthcare experts from the Review process. https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details