Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-05-04 20:35:43 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 11D840B902E1DDC3DDC1F5E3F3E6EB33C11C8133A7948EAE6CF221509AEAB525
Participant Details
Original Note:
multiple experts, medical professionals & scholars have shown that the Cass Report has overt prejudice, pathologisation, poor & inconsistent use of evidence, non-evidenced claims, & the intentional exclusion of service users and trans healthcare experts from the Review process. https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details