Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 22:27:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A219E7A2D6A4E925E5E3E8307FD5C360AA918E38FD1BE3F03A2C71DBB80DCAC8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wie im verlinkten WDR Artikel zu lesen, haben die Betreiber einem Weiterbetrieb keine Absage erteilt, sondern darauf hingewiesen, dass er "mit hohen Hürden technischer als auch genehmigungsrechtlicher Natur verbunden" wäre.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786760345639403643
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A219E7A2D6A4E925E5E3E8307FD5C360AA918E38FD1BE3F03A2C71DBB80DCAC8
  • createdAtMillis - 1714861667705
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786760345639403643A219E7A2D6A4E925E5E3E8307FD5C360AA918E38FD1BE3F03A2C71DBB80DCAC8