Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 14:47:58 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A4BE85ECCA5FB80D1E9E3A29FBBC4B32797AE6A6BDAB470D0B5287C611F5D82
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wie im verlinkten WDR Artikel zu lesen, haben die Betreiber einem Weiterbetrieb keine Absage erteilt, sondern darauf hingewiesen, dass er "mit hohen Hürden technischer als auch genehmigungsrechtlicher Natur verbunden" wäre.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786760345639403643
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A4BE85ECCA5FB80D1E9E3A29FBBC4B32797AE6A6BDAB470D0B5287C611F5D82
  • createdAtMillis - 1714834078543
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17867603456394036435A4BE85ECCA5FB80D1E9E3A29FBBC4B32797AE6A6BDAB470D0B5287C611F5D82