Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 15:00:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 446341B8322AAD9976FD0C8CD1710B39B9E8DBB173FD40B09DF8FF3C439BCECF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wie im verlinkten WDR Artikel zu lesen, haben die Betreiber einem Weiterbetrieb keine Absage erteilt, sondern darauf hingewiesen, dass er "mit hohen Hürden technischer als auch genehmigungsrechtlicher Natur verbunden" wäre.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786760345639403643
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 446341B8322AAD9976FD0C8CD1710B39B9E8DBB173FD40B09DF8FF3C439BCECF
  • createdAtMillis - 1714834854936
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1786760345639403643446341B8322AAD9976FD0C8CD1710B39B9E8DBB173FD40B09DF8FF3C439BCECF