Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-04 14:28:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3FD27F90B09EEF8877DB5473C6D0C2416056CAE1C2F4AD0229FF6ED488F31779
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wie im verlinkten WDR Artikel zu lesen, haben die Betreiber einem Weiterbetrieb keine Absage erteilt, sondern darauf hingewiesen, dass er "mit hohen Hürden technischer als auch genehmigungsrechtlicher Natur verbunden" wäre.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1786760345639403643
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3FD27F90B09EEF8877DB5473C6D0C2416056CAE1C2F4AD0229FF6ED488F31779
  • createdAtMillis - 1714832924952
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17867603456394036433FD27F90B09EEF8877DB5473C6D0C2416056CAE1C2F4AD0229FF6ED488F31779